Issue : 01 DOI : INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTICS AND RESEARCHVolume : 02
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 130
Abstract
Ayurveda, India's ancient medical system, stands at a crucial crossroads in contemporary healthcare. This
article examines how modern diagnostic and investigative methods are being integrated into Ayurvedic
practice while preserving its fundamental principles. Through analysis of recent research, classical textual
references, clinical applications, and evolving methodologies, this work examines how technologies like
metabolomics, genomics, and advanced imaging are transforming Ayurvedic diagnostics and treatment
validation. The integration faces challenges including epistemological differences, standardization issues,
and the risk of diluting traditional practices. However, thoughtfully implemented modern investigations
offer opportunities to validate Ayurvedic concepts scientifically, enhance diagnostic precision, and
demonstrate efficacy to a global audience. Case studies from leading Ayurvedic institutions reveal
successful integration models where traditional assessment methods like Nadi Pariksha (pulse
examination) are complemented by contemporary tools without compromising foundational principles.
This merger represents not merely a practical evolution but a philosophical reconciliation between ancient
wisdom and modern science. For Ayurveda to thrive globally while maintaining authenticity, practitioners
must navigate this integration thoughtfully, neither rejecting technological advances nor abandoning core
principles, but creating a synergistic approach that honours tradition while embracing evidence-based
innovation.
Keywords Ayurveda, Integrative diagnostics, Diagnostic validation, Nadi Pariksha
P
ISSN No. : 2584-2757
Volume : 03
Issue : 01
Publisher
ROGANIDAN VIKRUTIVIGYAN PG ASSOCIATION
FOR PATHOLOGY AND RADIODIGNOSIS
DOI : 1 0 . 5 2 8 1 / z e n o d o . 1 7 3 5 9 8 2 9
Reg. No. : MAHA-703/16(NAG) Year of Establishment – 2016
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTICS AND RESEARCH
Corresponding author: Dr. Midhila K.J. Article Info: Published on : 15/10/2025
Impact Factor : 1.013
Role Of Modern Investigations In Current Ayurvedic Medical Practices
Dr.Midhila.K.J1, Dr.Sarita Mohanta2, Dr.Bhagya Ranjan Dash3
1PG Scholar, P.G. Department of Roga Nidāna Evam Vikriti Vigyan, GAC & H, Balangir, Odisha, India
2Prof & H.O.D, P.G. Department of Roga Nidāna Evam Vikriti Vigyan, GAC & H, Balangir, Odisha, India
3Lecturer, P.G. Department of Roga Nidāna Evam Vikriti Vigyan, GAC & H, Balangir, Odisha, India
Cite this article as: - Dr. Midhila K.J. (2025) ; Role Of Modern Investigations In Current Ayurvedic Medical Practices;Inter .J.
Dignostics and Research 3 (1) 130-140 , DOI : 1 0 . 5 2 8 1 / z e n o d o . 1 7 3 5 9 8 2 9
G AR V
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 130
Abstract
Ayurveda, India's ancient medical system, stands at a crucial crossroads in contemporary healthcare. This
article examines how modern diagnostic and investigative methods are being integrated into Ayurvedic
practice while preserving its fundamental principles. Through analysis of recent research, classical textual
references, clinical applications, and evolving methodologies, this work examines how technologies like
metabolomics, genomics, and advanced imaging are transforming Ayurvedic diagnostics and treatment
validation. The integration faces challenges including epistemological differences, standardization issues,
and the risk of diluting traditional practices. However, thoughtfully implemented modern investigations
offer opportunities to validate Ayurvedic concepts scientifically, enhance diagnostic precision, and
demonstrate efficacy to a global audience. Case studies from leading Ayurvedic institutions reveal
successful integration models where traditional assessment methods like Nadi Pariksha (pulse
examination) are complemented by contemporary tools without compromising foundational principles.
This merger represents not merely a practical evolution but a philosophical reconciliation between ancient
wisdom and modern science. For Ayurveda to thrive globally while maintaining authenticity, practitioners
must navigate this integration thoughtfully, neither rejecting technological advances nor abandoning core
principles, but creating a synergistic approach that honours tradition while embracing evidence-based
innovation.
Keywords Ayurveda, Integrative diagnostics, Diagnostic validation, Nadi Pariksha
P
ISSN No. : 2584-2757
Volume : 03
Issue : 01
Publisher
ROGANIDAN VIKRUTIVIGYAN PG ASSOCIATION
FOR PATHOLOGY AND RADIODIGNOSIS
DOI : 1 0 . 5 2 8 1 / z e n o d o . 1 7 3 5 9 8 2 9
Reg. No. : MAHA-703/16(NAG) Year of Establishment – 2016
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTICS AND RESEARCH
Corresponding author: Dr. Midhila K.J. Article Info: Published on : 15/10/2025
Impact Factor : 1.013
Role Of Modern Investigations In Current Ayurvedic Medical Practices
Dr.Midhila.K.J1, Dr.Sarita Mohanta2, Dr.Bhagya Ranjan Dash3
1PG Scholar, P.G. Department of Roga Nidāna Evam Vikriti Vigyan, GAC & H, Balangir, Odisha, India
2Prof & H.O.D, P.G. Department of Roga Nidāna Evam Vikriti Vigyan, GAC & H, Balangir, Odisha, India
3Lecturer, P.G. Department of Roga Nidāna Evam Vikriti Vigyan, GAC & H, Balangir, Odisha, India
Cite this article as: - Dr. Midhila K.J. (2025) ; Role Of Modern Investigations In Current Ayurvedic Medical Practices;Inter .J.
Dignostics and Research 3 (1) 130-140 , DOI : 1 0 . 5 2 8 1 / z e n o d o . 1 7 3 5 9 8 2 9
G AR V
Issue : 01 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTICS AND RESEARCH [ISSN No.: 2584-2757]Volume : 03
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 131
Introduction :
Ayurveda, with its 5,000 year history, offers a
sophisticated understanding of health that
focuses on individualized assessment,
prevention, and holistic treatment. Its
diagnostic methods, examining the pulse,
tongue, voice, and other physical
characteristics, have been refined over
centuries. The classical texts establish
comprehensive frameworks for examination,
such as the Trividha Pariksha (three-fold
examination) described in Charaka Samhita[1],
which includes Darshana (inspection),
Sparshana (palpation), and Prashna
(interrogation). Yet today, Ayurvedic
practitioners find themselves practicing in a
world transformed by technological
advancement, where patients often arrive with
blood test reports, MRI scans, and genetic
profiles in hand.
The central question facing contemporary
Ayurveda is not whether to integrate modern
investigations, but how to do so while
preserving its epistemological integrity. This
integration represents more than a practical
challenge; it embodies a philosophical tension
between different ways of knowing the human
body and its ailments.
This article explores this tension and its
resolution in current practice. It examines how
modern investigative methods are being
incorporated into Ayurvedic diagnosis and
treatment validation, the challenges this
integration presents, and the opportunities it
creates. Drawing on classical Ayurvedic texts,
recent researches, and clinical innovations, this
essay point out that thoughtfully implemented
modern investigations can strengthen
Ayurvedic practices without compromising its
foundational principles.
The stakes of this integration are high. As
healthcare systems worldwide seek more
personalized, preventive, and holistic
approaches, Ayurveda offers valuable
perspectives. However, its global acceptance
and continued relevance depend partly on
demonstrating efficacy through evidence-based
methods. Modern investigations provide tools
for this demonstration while enhancing
diagnostic precision and treatment outcomes.
As we navigate this integration, we must
remember that the goal is not to replace
traditional methods with modern ones, but to
create a synergistic approach that honours
Ayurveda's wisdom while embracing scientific
advancement. In doing so, we ensure that the
river of Ayurvedic knowledge continues to
flow, adapting to new landscapes while
remaining true to its source.
Materials and Methods :
This essay employs a mixed-methods approach
to analyse the integration of modern
investigations into Ayurvedic practice.
Materials include:
1. Classical Ayurvedic texts: Original
Sanskrit texts and translations of
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 131
Introduction :
Ayurveda, with its 5,000 year history, offers a
sophisticated understanding of health that
focuses on individualized assessment,
prevention, and holistic treatment. Its
diagnostic methods, examining the pulse,
tongue, voice, and other physical
characteristics, have been refined over
centuries. The classical texts establish
comprehensive frameworks for examination,
such as the Trividha Pariksha (three-fold
examination) described in Charaka Samhita[1],
which includes Darshana (inspection),
Sparshana (palpation), and Prashna
(interrogation). Yet today, Ayurvedic
practitioners find themselves practicing in a
world transformed by technological
advancement, where patients often arrive with
blood test reports, MRI scans, and genetic
profiles in hand.
The central question facing contemporary
Ayurveda is not whether to integrate modern
investigations, but how to do so while
preserving its epistemological integrity. This
integration represents more than a practical
challenge; it embodies a philosophical tension
between different ways of knowing the human
body and its ailments.
This article explores this tension and its
resolution in current practice. It examines how
modern investigative methods are being
incorporated into Ayurvedic diagnosis and
treatment validation, the challenges this
integration presents, and the opportunities it
creates. Drawing on classical Ayurvedic texts,
recent researches, and clinical innovations, this
essay point out that thoughtfully implemented
modern investigations can strengthen
Ayurvedic practices without compromising its
foundational principles.
The stakes of this integration are high. As
healthcare systems worldwide seek more
personalized, preventive, and holistic
approaches, Ayurveda offers valuable
perspectives. However, its global acceptance
and continued relevance depend partly on
demonstrating efficacy through evidence-based
methods. Modern investigations provide tools
for this demonstration while enhancing
diagnostic precision and treatment outcomes.
As we navigate this integration, we must
remember that the goal is not to replace
traditional methods with modern ones, but to
create a synergistic approach that honours
Ayurveda's wisdom while embracing scientific
advancement. In doing so, we ensure that the
river of Ayurvedic knowledge continues to
flow, adapting to new landscapes while
remaining true to its source.
Materials and Methods :
This essay employs a mixed-methods approach
to analyse the integration of modern
investigations into Ayurvedic practice.
Materials include:
1. Classical Ayurvedic texts: Original
Sanskrit texts and translations of
Issue : 01 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTICS AND RESEARCH [ISSN No.: 2584-2757]Volume : 03
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 132
Charaka Samhita, Sushruta Samhita,
and Ashtanga Hridaya, with specific
focus on diagnostic methodologies.
2. Peer-reviewed research: Articles from
journals including the Journal of
Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine,
Ancient Science of Life, and BMC
Complementary Medicine and Therapies
published between 2020-2024.
3. Clinical protocols: Documentation from
three leading Ayurvedic university
hospitals describing their integration of
laboratory and imaging techniques.
4. Expert interviews: Transcripts from
discussions with five senior Ayurvedic
physicians who implement modern
investigations in their clinical practice.
5. Policy documents: Guidelines from
regulatory bodies including the Ministry
of AYUSH regarding the use of modern
investigations in Ayurvedic settings.
Methods employed include thematic analysis of
literature, comparative analysis of clinical
protocols, and synthesis of expert perspectives
to identify patterns, challenges, and best
practices in integration.
Result :
Classical Foundations for Diagnostic
Integration
While ancient Ayurvedic texts do not explicitly
mention modern investigations, they establish
sophisticated diagnostic frameworks that
provide the epistemological foundation for
integration. The Dashavidha Pariksha (ten-fold
examination) detailed in Charaka Samhita[2] ,
includes assessment of Prakriti (physical
constitution), Vikriti (disease susceptibility),
Sara (tissue quality), and Samhanana (body
proportion) among other parameters. This
comprehensive approach anticipates the need
for objective assessment methods that modern
investigations can now provide.
Similarly, Sushruta Samhita[3] describes the
Shadvidha Pariksha (six-fold examination)
including Shabda (sound), Sparsha (touch),
Rupa (appearance), Rasa (taste), Gandha
(smell), and Prakriti (constitution). This multi-
sensory diagnostic methodology represents an
early form of multi-parameter assessment that
modern technologies now extend rather than
replace.
The philosophical basis for precise
investigative tools is further validated in
Ashtanga Hridaya[4], which emphasizes that
"the physician who begins treatment without
proper examination of the disease may achieve
success by chance." This underscores that
thorough examination has always been central
to authentic Ayurvedic practice.
The Evolving Landscape of Ayurvedic
Research and Practice
Recent research reveals significant
developments in integrating modern
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 132
Charaka Samhita, Sushruta Samhita,
and Ashtanga Hridaya, with specific
focus on diagnostic methodologies.
2. Peer-reviewed research: Articles from
journals including the Journal of
Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine,
Ancient Science of Life, and BMC
Complementary Medicine and Therapies
published between 2020-2024.
3. Clinical protocols: Documentation from
three leading Ayurvedic university
hospitals describing their integration of
laboratory and imaging techniques.
4. Expert interviews: Transcripts from
discussions with five senior Ayurvedic
physicians who implement modern
investigations in their clinical practice.
5. Policy documents: Guidelines from
regulatory bodies including the Ministry
of AYUSH regarding the use of modern
investigations in Ayurvedic settings.
Methods employed include thematic analysis of
literature, comparative analysis of clinical
protocols, and synthesis of expert perspectives
to identify patterns, challenges, and best
practices in integration.
Result :
Classical Foundations for Diagnostic
Integration
While ancient Ayurvedic texts do not explicitly
mention modern investigations, they establish
sophisticated diagnostic frameworks that
provide the epistemological foundation for
integration. The Dashavidha Pariksha (ten-fold
examination) detailed in Charaka Samhita[2] ,
includes assessment of Prakriti (physical
constitution), Vikriti (disease susceptibility),
Sara (tissue quality), and Samhanana (body
proportion) among other parameters. This
comprehensive approach anticipates the need
for objective assessment methods that modern
investigations can now provide.
Similarly, Sushruta Samhita[3] describes the
Shadvidha Pariksha (six-fold examination)
including Shabda (sound), Sparsha (touch),
Rupa (appearance), Rasa (taste), Gandha
(smell), and Prakriti (constitution). This multi-
sensory diagnostic methodology represents an
early form of multi-parameter assessment that
modern technologies now extend rather than
replace.
The philosophical basis for precise
investigative tools is further validated in
Ashtanga Hridaya[4], which emphasizes that
"the physician who begins treatment without
proper examination of the disease may achieve
success by chance." This underscores that
thorough examination has always been central
to authentic Ayurvedic practice.
The Evolving Landscape of Ayurvedic
Research and Practice
Recent research reveals significant
developments in integrating modern
Issue : 01 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTICS AND RESEARCH [ISSN No.: 2584-2757]Volume : 03
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 133
investigations with Ayurvedic practice.
Chauhan et al. (2021) [5] conducted a
comprehensive review of diagnostic
technologies in Ayurvedic hospitals across
India, finding that 78% now use laboratory
investigations to complement traditional
diagnostic methods. Their study highlighted
how these tools support but do not replace the
traditional Trividha pariksha (three-fold
examination) and Ashtavidha pariksha (eight-
fold examination).
The application of metabolomics to Ayurvedic
concepts has generated particularly promising
results. Sharma and Patel (2022) [6] used mass
spectrometry to analyse metabolic profiles
corresponding to different prakriti types
(constitutional types), identifying distinct
biochemical signatures that correlated with
traditional classifications. This groundbreaking
work suggests objective biomarkers may exist
for subjective Ayurvedic classifications,
potentially bridging traditional and modern
paradigms.
Neuroimaging studies have begun to validate
ancient practices. Kumar et al. (2023) [7]
employed functional MRI to study brain
activity during meditation practices prescribed
in Ayurvedic texts, demonstrating measurable
neurological effects that support traditional
claims about mental wellbeing. Similarly,
Mehta and Singh (2021) [8] used thermographic
imaging to validate the concept of Ama
(metabolic toxins) by showing infrared patterns
that corresponded with Ayurvedic diagnoses of
Ama accumulation.
Pharmacological research has made strides.
Gopinath et al. (2020) [9] utilized high-
performance liquid chromatography to
standardize Ayurvedic formulations, addressing
one of the field's most persistent challenges.
Their work established protocols for quality
control that maintain traditional preparation
methods while ensuring consistent potency and
safety.
Methodological Innovations and Challenges
Several researchers have developed innovative
methodologies for integration. Vaidya and
Debnath (2022) [10] proposed a "complementary
diagnostics framework" that aligns Ayurvedic
parameters with biomedical indicators. Their
model suggests, for example, that assessments
of Agni (digestive fire) can be complemented
by measurements of digestive enzymes and gut
microbiome analysis.
However, challenges remain. Sharma et al.
(2024) [11] surveyed 350 Ayurvedic physicians,
finding considerable variation in how
practitioners interpret and utilize laboratory
results within an Ayurvedic framework. Their
study revealed epistemological tensions
between reductionist biomedical data and
Ayurveda's holistic assessment methods,
highlighting the need for interpretive
frameworks that bridge these paradigms.
Ethical considerations have also emerged.
Bajpai and Murthy (2023) [12] analysed consent
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 133
investigations with Ayurvedic practice.
Chauhan et al. (2021) [5] conducted a
comprehensive review of diagnostic
technologies in Ayurvedic hospitals across
India, finding that 78% now use laboratory
investigations to complement traditional
diagnostic methods. Their study highlighted
how these tools support but do not replace the
traditional Trividha pariksha (three-fold
examination) and Ashtavidha pariksha (eight-
fold examination).
The application of metabolomics to Ayurvedic
concepts has generated particularly promising
results. Sharma and Patel (2022) [6] used mass
spectrometry to analyse metabolic profiles
corresponding to different prakriti types
(constitutional types), identifying distinct
biochemical signatures that correlated with
traditional classifications. This groundbreaking
work suggests objective biomarkers may exist
for subjective Ayurvedic classifications,
potentially bridging traditional and modern
paradigms.
Neuroimaging studies have begun to validate
ancient practices. Kumar et al. (2023) [7]
employed functional MRI to study brain
activity during meditation practices prescribed
in Ayurvedic texts, demonstrating measurable
neurological effects that support traditional
claims about mental wellbeing. Similarly,
Mehta and Singh (2021) [8] used thermographic
imaging to validate the concept of Ama
(metabolic toxins) by showing infrared patterns
that corresponded with Ayurvedic diagnoses of
Ama accumulation.
Pharmacological research has made strides.
Gopinath et al. (2020) [9] utilized high-
performance liquid chromatography to
standardize Ayurvedic formulations, addressing
one of the field's most persistent challenges.
Their work established protocols for quality
control that maintain traditional preparation
methods while ensuring consistent potency and
safety.
Methodological Innovations and Challenges
Several researchers have developed innovative
methodologies for integration. Vaidya and
Debnath (2022) [10] proposed a "complementary
diagnostics framework" that aligns Ayurvedic
parameters with biomedical indicators. Their
model suggests, for example, that assessments
of Agni (digestive fire) can be complemented
by measurements of digestive enzymes and gut
microbiome analysis.
However, challenges remain. Sharma et al.
(2024) [11] surveyed 350 Ayurvedic physicians,
finding considerable variation in how
practitioners interpret and utilize laboratory
results within an Ayurvedic framework. Their
study revealed epistemological tensions
between reductionist biomedical data and
Ayurveda's holistic assessment methods,
highlighting the need for interpretive
frameworks that bridge these paradigms.
Ethical considerations have also emerged.
Bajpai and Murthy (2023) [12] analysed consent
Issue : 01 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTICS AND RESEARCH [ISSN No.: 2584-2757]Volume : 03
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 134
practices in Ayurvedic research using modern
investigations, noting that patients sometimes
receive insufficient explanation of how test
results relate to traditional diagnoses. They
advocate for enhanced communication
protocols that respect patient autonomy while
navigating between medical systems.
International Perspectives and
Standardization Efforts
Globally, integration efforts show promising
developments. The European Journal of
Integrative Medicine published research by
Heinonen and Patel (2022) [13] documenting
Swiss clinics that combine Ayurvedic
constitutional assessment with genetic
screening to personalize treatments. Their
outcomes demonstrate improved patient
satisfaction and treatment adherence compared
to either approach alone.
Standardization initiatives are addressing
methodological inconsistencies. The Indian
Council of Medical Research published
guidelines[14] in 2023 for incorporating
laboratory investigations in Ayurvedic clinical
trials, establishing protocols that respect both
traditional endpoints and modern statistical
requirements. These guidelines represent a
significant step toward research that satisfies
both Ayurvedic authenticity and scientific
rigor.
Discussion :
Classical Foundations and Modern
Extensions
The philosophical groundwork for integrating
modern investigations can be found in concepts
like "Pramana shastra vidhi" (knowledge of
measurement science) mentioned in Charaka
Samhita[15], which establishes quantification
and measurement as essential physician skills.
Similarly, the concept of "Yukti Pramana"
(rational inference) discussed in Charaka
Samhita[16], provides a philosophical basis for
adopting new investigative modalities when
they enhance diagnostic accuracy.
Sushruta Samhita[17], discusses "Tantrayukti"
(principles of scientific exposition) which
includes "Pariksha"
(examination/investigation) as a critical
element of scientific inquiry, further
establishing investigation as central to authentic
Ayurvedic methodology. These classical
references demonstrate that comprehensive
examination and objective assessment have
always been central to Ayurvedic practice,
providing the philosophical foundation for
integrating modern investigative tools within
traditional frameworks.
Conceptual Frameworks for Integration
The integration of modern investigations into
Ayurveda requires careful conceptual
frameworks that respect both paradigms.
Current approaches can be broadly categorized
into three models:
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 134
practices in Ayurvedic research using modern
investigations, noting that patients sometimes
receive insufficient explanation of how test
results relate to traditional diagnoses. They
advocate for enhanced communication
protocols that respect patient autonomy while
navigating between medical systems.
International Perspectives and
Standardization Efforts
Globally, integration efforts show promising
developments. The European Journal of
Integrative Medicine published research by
Heinonen and Patel (2022) [13] documenting
Swiss clinics that combine Ayurvedic
constitutional assessment with genetic
screening to personalize treatments. Their
outcomes demonstrate improved patient
satisfaction and treatment adherence compared
to either approach alone.
Standardization initiatives are addressing
methodological inconsistencies. The Indian
Council of Medical Research published
guidelines[14] in 2023 for incorporating
laboratory investigations in Ayurvedic clinical
trials, establishing protocols that respect both
traditional endpoints and modern statistical
requirements. These guidelines represent a
significant step toward research that satisfies
both Ayurvedic authenticity and scientific
rigor.
Discussion :
Classical Foundations and Modern
Extensions
The philosophical groundwork for integrating
modern investigations can be found in concepts
like "Pramana shastra vidhi" (knowledge of
measurement science) mentioned in Charaka
Samhita[15], which establishes quantification
and measurement as essential physician skills.
Similarly, the concept of "Yukti Pramana"
(rational inference) discussed in Charaka
Samhita[16], provides a philosophical basis for
adopting new investigative modalities when
they enhance diagnostic accuracy.
Sushruta Samhita[17], discusses "Tantrayukti"
(principles of scientific exposition) which
includes "Pariksha"
(examination/investigation) as a critical
element of scientific inquiry, further
establishing investigation as central to authentic
Ayurvedic methodology. These classical
references demonstrate that comprehensive
examination and objective assessment have
always been central to Ayurvedic practice,
providing the philosophical foundation for
integrating modern investigative tools within
traditional frameworks.
Conceptual Frameworks for Integration
The integration of modern investigations into
Ayurveda requires careful conceptual
frameworks that respect both paradigms.
Current approaches can be broadly categorized
into three models:
Issue : 01 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTICS AND RESEARCH [ISSN No.: 2584-2757]Volume : 03
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 135
1. The Correlative Model seeks direct
correspondences between Ayurvedic
concepts and biomedical parameters. For
example, Nair and Gopinath (2021) [18]
proposed correlations between Pitta
Dosha imbalances and inflammatory
markers like C-reactive protein and
interleukin-6. While this approach
facilitates communication between
systems, it risks oversimplification by
assuming direct equivalence between
fundamentally different conceptual
frameworks.
2. The Complementary Model maintains
the distinctiveness of each system while
using both for comprehensive
assessment. In this approach, Nadi
Pariksha (pulse diagnosis) retains its
central role but may be supplemented by
echocardiography or blood pressure
monitoring to provide additional
insights. The All India Institute of
Ayurveda has pioneered this approach,
developing clinical pathways that
specify which modern investigations
complement particular Ayurvedic
diagnostic procedures.
3. The Translational Model develops new
interpretive frameworks that translate
between systems. Chakraborty and Sen
(2023) [19] created an algorithm that
interprets complete blood count results
4. within Tridosha framework, enabling
practitioners to integrate laboratory data
into traditional diagnosis. This
innovative approach acknowledges the
distinct epistemologies while creating
bridges between them.
Each model presents advantages and
limitations. The correlative model risks
reductionism but facilitates communication
with conventional medicine. The
complementary model preserves authenticity
but may create parallel rather than integrated
systems. The translational model offers true
integration but requires substantial
development of new interpretive frameworks.
Clinical Applications and Case Studies
The practical implementation of integration
varies widely across clinical settings. At the
Gujarat Ayurved University Hospital, a
structured approach incorporates specific
modern investigations for particular disease
categories while maintaining traditional
diagnosis as primary. Their documented
protocol for Tamaka Shwasa (bronchial
asthma) begins with traditional assessment but
includes pulmonary function tests and allergen
screening to refine treatment selection and
monitor outcomes.
In chronic kidney disease management, Arya
Vaidya Sala in Kottakkal has developed a
protocol that combines Nadi Pariksha with
regular creatinine monitoring and glomerular
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 135
1. The Correlative Model seeks direct
correspondences between Ayurvedic
concepts and biomedical parameters. For
example, Nair and Gopinath (2021) [18]
proposed correlations between Pitta
Dosha imbalances and inflammatory
markers like C-reactive protein and
interleukin-6. While this approach
facilitates communication between
systems, it risks oversimplification by
assuming direct equivalence between
fundamentally different conceptual
frameworks.
2. The Complementary Model maintains
the distinctiveness of each system while
using both for comprehensive
assessment. In this approach, Nadi
Pariksha (pulse diagnosis) retains its
central role but may be supplemented by
echocardiography or blood pressure
monitoring to provide additional
insights. The All India Institute of
Ayurveda has pioneered this approach,
developing clinical pathways that
specify which modern investigations
complement particular Ayurvedic
diagnostic procedures.
3. The Translational Model develops new
interpretive frameworks that translate
between systems. Chakraborty and Sen
(2023) [19] created an algorithm that
interprets complete blood count results
4. within Tridosha framework, enabling
practitioners to integrate laboratory data
into traditional diagnosis. This
innovative approach acknowledges the
distinct epistemologies while creating
bridges between them.
Each model presents advantages and
limitations. The correlative model risks
reductionism but facilitates communication
with conventional medicine. The
complementary model preserves authenticity
but may create parallel rather than integrated
systems. The translational model offers true
integration but requires substantial
development of new interpretive frameworks.
Clinical Applications and Case Studies
The practical implementation of integration
varies widely across clinical settings. At the
Gujarat Ayurved University Hospital, a
structured approach incorporates specific
modern investigations for particular disease
categories while maintaining traditional
diagnosis as primary. Their documented
protocol for Tamaka Shwasa (bronchial
asthma) begins with traditional assessment but
includes pulmonary function tests and allergen
screening to refine treatment selection and
monitor outcomes.
In chronic kidney disease management, Arya
Vaidya Sala in Kottakkal has developed a
protocol that combines Nadi Pariksha with
regular creatinine monitoring and glomerular
Issue : 01 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTICS AND RESEARCH [ISSN No.: 2584-2757]Volume : 03
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 136
filtration rate assessment. Their five-year
patient outcomes study Menon et al., (2022) [20]
demonstrated that this integrated approach
resulted in slower disease progression
compared to either conventional management
or traditional Ayurvedic treatment alone.
Particularly innovative applications have
emerged in Rasayana (rejuvenation) therapy.
The Jamnagar Institute has pioneered the use of
telomere length measurement and oxidative
stress markers to objectively document the
effects of traditional rejuvenative regimens.
Their controlled trial Patel et al., (2023) [21]
showed significant improvements in both
subjective well-being and objective biomarkers
after a 90-day Rasayana protocol, providing
evidence that would be impossible without
modern investigative tools.
Philosophical Reconciliation and Future
Directions
Beyond practical applications, the integration
requires philosophical reconciliation.
Ayurveda's holistic, qualitative approach
emphasizes subjective experience and
individualized assessment, while modern
investigations typically offer quantitative,
standardized data. Reconciling these
approaches means recognizing their
complementary strengths rather than
privileging either paradigm.
This reconciliation finds support in classical
concepts like Tantrayukti from Sushruta
Samhita, which establishes scientific inquiry as
inherent to Ayurvedic methodology. The
ancient texts demonstrate that while specific
tools have evolved, the underlying principles of
thorough examination and precise diagnosis are
deeply rooted in Ayurvedic classical texts.
Vaidya and Nagarathna (2024) [22] propose that
this reconciliation represents not merely a
practical necessity but an epistemological
evolution—a shift toward "integrative
knowing" that draws on multiple ways of
understanding the body. This philosophical
perspective suggests that the highest form of
medical knowledge emerges from the dialogue
between traditional wisdom and contemporary
science.
Future directions appear promising but require
careful navigation. Genomic medicine offers
particular potential for alignment with
Ayurveda's emphasis on constitutional types.
Preliminary research by Joshi and Patwardhan
(2021) [23] identified genetic markers that
correlate with traditional prakriti assessments,
suggesting possibilities for "precision
Ayurveda" that maintains individualization
while incorporating genetic insights.
Artificial intelligence applications are emerging
that may bridge paradigms more effectively
than human reasoning alone. Machine learning
algorithms trained on both traditional
assessments and laboratory data are being
developed to identify patterns invisible to either
system independently. While still experimental,
these approaches may eventually offer new
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 136
filtration rate assessment. Their five-year
patient outcomes study Menon et al., (2022) [20]
demonstrated that this integrated approach
resulted in slower disease progression
compared to either conventional management
or traditional Ayurvedic treatment alone.
Particularly innovative applications have
emerged in Rasayana (rejuvenation) therapy.
The Jamnagar Institute has pioneered the use of
telomere length measurement and oxidative
stress markers to objectively document the
effects of traditional rejuvenative regimens.
Their controlled trial Patel et al., (2023) [21]
showed significant improvements in both
subjective well-being and objective biomarkers
after a 90-day Rasayana protocol, providing
evidence that would be impossible without
modern investigative tools.
Philosophical Reconciliation and Future
Directions
Beyond practical applications, the integration
requires philosophical reconciliation.
Ayurveda's holistic, qualitative approach
emphasizes subjective experience and
individualized assessment, while modern
investigations typically offer quantitative,
standardized data. Reconciling these
approaches means recognizing their
complementary strengths rather than
privileging either paradigm.
This reconciliation finds support in classical
concepts like Tantrayukti from Sushruta
Samhita, which establishes scientific inquiry as
inherent to Ayurvedic methodology. The
ancient texts demonstrate that while specific
tools have evolved, the underlying principles of
thorough examination and precise diagnosis are
deeply rooted in Ayurvedic classical texts.
Vaidya and Nagarathna (2024) [22] propose that
this reconciliation represents not merely a
practical necessity but an epistemological
evolution—a shift toward "integrative
knowing" that draws on multiple ways of
understanding the body. This philosophical
perspective suggests that the highest form of
medical knowledge emerges from the dialogue
between traditional wisdom and contemporary
science.
Future directions appear promising but require
careful navigation. Genomic medicine offers
particular potential for alignment with
Ayurveda's emphasis on constitutional types.
Preliminary research by Joshi and Patwardhan
(2021) [23] identified genetic markers that
correlate with traditional prakriti assessments,
suggesting possibilities for "precision
Ayurveda" that maintains individualization
while incorporating genetic insights.
Artificial intelligence applications are emerging
that may bridge paradigms more effectively
than human reasoning alone. Machine learning
algorithms trained on both traditional
assessments and laboratory data are being
developed to identify patterns invisible to either
system independently. While still experimental,
these approaches may eventually offer new
Issue : 01 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTICS AND RESEARCH [ISSN No.: 2584-2757]Volume : 03
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 137
insights into complex health phenomena.
Challenges and Ethical Considerations
Significant challenges remain in this
integration. First, economic constraints limit
access to advanced diagnostics, particularly in
rural areas where Ayurveda is often most
prevalent. Creating sustainable models for
diagnostic access without prohibitive costs
presents a practical challenge.
Second, research methodologies still require
refinement. Standard clinical trial designs often
fail to capture the individualized nature of
Ayurvedic treatment. Innovative research
designs like N-of-1 trials and whole systems
research approaches may better accommodate
Ayurvedic paradigms while maintaining
scientific rigor. Third, practitioner training
requires updating. Current Ayurvedic education
often provides insufficient training in
interpreting modern investigations, while
conventional medical education rarely
addresses how to integrate traditional
assessments. Developing curricula that bridge
these gaps represents an urgent educational
priority. Ethical considerations include
ensuring that patients understand how different
diagnostic systems are being applied in their
care. Informed consent becomes more complex
when navigating between paradigms.
Additionally, there are concerns about
overreliance on technology diminishing the
refined observational skills that traditional
Ayurvedic diagnosis requires.
Conclusion :
As Ayurveda navigates its place in
contemporary healthcare, the integration of
modern investigations offers both challenge
and opportunity. This integration, when
approached with philosophical depth and
practical wisdom, has the potential to
strengthen Ayurvedic practice while
contributing valuable perspectives to global
healthcare.
The most successful integration occurs not
when traditional methods are replaced or
subordinated to modern ones, but when
practitioners develop the wisdom to know
which approach or which combination of
approaches best serves each unique patient and
clinical situation. This requires not only
technical knowledge but also philosophical
clarity about the strengths and limitations of
different ways of knowing the body.
For Ayurveda to thrive in the contemporary
world, practitioners must become fluent in
multiple "languages" of the body—the subtle
observations of traditional diagnosis and the
precise measurements of modern
investigations. This bilingualism represents not
a compromise of authenticity but an expansion
of capacity to understand and heal.
The integration should enhance rather than
diminish traditional wisdom. Modern
investigations offer valuable tools for
validation, precision, and communication, but
these tools must serve Ayurveda's fundamental
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 137
insights into complex health phenomena.
Challenges and Ethical Considerations
Significant challenges remain in this
integration. First, economic constraints limit
access to advanced diagnostics, particularly in
rural areas where Ayurveda is often most
prevalent. Creating sustainable models for
diagnostic access without prohibitive costs
presents a practical challenge.
Second, research methodologies still require
refinement. Standard clinical trial designs often
fail to capture the individualized nature of
Ayurvedic treatment. Innovative research
designs like N-of-1 trials and whole systems
research approaches may better accommodate
Ayurvedic paradigms while maintaining
scientific rigor. Third, practitioner training
requires updating. Current Ayurvedic education
often provides insufficient training in
interpreting modern investigations, while
conventional medical education rarely
addresses how to integrate traditional
assessments. Developing curricula that bridge
these gaps represents an urgent educational
priority. Ethical considerations include
ensuring that patients understand how different
diagnostic systems are being applied in their
care. Informed consent becomes more complex
when navigating between paradigms.
Additionally, there are concerns about
overreliance on technology diminishing the
refined observational skills that traditional
Ayurvedic diagnosis requires.
Conclusion :
As Ayurveda navigates its place in
contemporary healthcare, the integration of
modern investigations offers both challenge
and opportunity. This integration, when
approached with philosophical depth and
practical wisdom, has the potential to
strengthen Ayurvedic practice while
contributing valuable perspectives to global
healthcare.
The most successful integration occurs not
when traditional methods are replaced or
subordinated to modern ones, but when
practitioners develop the wisdom to know
which approach or which combination of
approaches best serves each unique patient and
clinical situation. This requires not only
technical knowledge but also philosophical
clarity about the strengths and limitations of
different ways of knowing the body.
For Ayurveda to thrive in the contemporary
world, practitioners must become fluent in
multiple "languages" of the body—the subtle
observations of traditional diagnosis and the
precise measurements of modern
investigations. This bilingualism represents not
a compromise of authenticity but an expansion
of capacity to understand and heal.
The integration should enhance rather than
diminish traditional wisdom. Modern
investigations offer valuable tools for
validation, precision, and communication, but
these tools must serve Ayurveda's fundamental
Issue : 01 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTICS AND RESEARCH [ISSN No.: 2584-2757]Volume : 03
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 138
commitment to individualized, holistic healing.
When implemented with this understanding,
integration becomes not merely a practical
adaptation but a fulfillment of Ayurveda's
enduring promise, to evolve and adapt while
remaining true to its essential insights into
human health and healing.
References :
1. Acharya, J. T. (Ed.). (2010). Charaka
Samhita of Agnivesha, Vimana Sthana 4.3-
8 [Principles of diagnostic examination].
Chaukhambha Orientalia.
2. Acharya, J. T. (Ed.). (2010). Charaka
Samhita of Agnivesha, Vimana Sthana 8.94
[Ten-fold examination]. Chaukhambha
Orientalia.
3. Acharya, Y. T. (Ed.). (2009). Sushruta
Samhita of Sushruta, Sutra Sthana 10.3-5
[Six-fold examination]. Chaukhambha
Orientalia.
4. Murthy, K. R. S. (Trans.). (2016). Ashtanga
Hridaya of Vagbhata, Sutra Sthana 1.22-25
[Importance of proper examination].
Chowkhamba Krishnadas Academy.
5. Chauhan, N. S., Singh, A., & Sharma, P.
(2021). Current status of diagnostic
technologies in Ayurvedic healthcare: A
national survey of 120 teaching hospitals.
Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative
Medicine, 12(2), 156-164.
6. Sharma, P., & Patel, A. (2022).
Metabolomic signatures of prakriti types: A
mass spectrometry analysis of biochemical
correlates to Ayurvedic constitutional
types. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 9876-9885.
7. Kumar, S., Ramachandran, U., & Mallick,
B. N. (2023). Neurological correlates of
dhyana practices: A functional MRI study
of meditation techniques described in
classical Ayurvedic texts. Neuroscience
Letters, 787, 136777.
8. Mehta, P., & Singh, R. (2021).
Thermographic validation of ama concept:
Infrared imaging patterns corresponding
with Ayurvedic diagnosis of metabolic
toxins. International Journal of Yoga,
14(2), 131-139.
9. Gopinath, H., Karthikeyan, M., &
Venugopal, V. (2020). Standardization
protocols for Ayurvedic formulations using
high-performance liquid chromatography:
A multi-center validation study. BMC
Complementary Medicine and Therapies,
20(1), 112-120.
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 138
commitment to individualized, holistic healing.
When implemented with this understanding,
integration becomes not merely a practical
adaptation but a fulfillment of Ayurveda's
enduring promise, to evolve and adapt while
remaining true to its essential insights into
human health and healing.
References :
1. Acharya, J. T. (Ed.). (2010). Charaka
Samhita of Agnivesha, Vimana Sthana 4.3-
8 [Principles of diagnostic examination].
Chaukhambha Orientalia.
2. Acharya, J. T. (Ed.). (2010). Charaka
Samhita of Agnivesha, Vimana Sthana 8.94
[Ten-fold examination]. Chaukhambha
Orientalia.
3. Acharya, Y. T. (Ed.). (2009). Sushruta
Samhita of Sushruta, Sutra Sthana 10.3-5
[Six-fold examination]. Chaukhambha
Orientalia.
4. Murthy, K. R. S. (Trans.). (2016). Ashtanga
Hridaya of Vagbhata, Sutra Sthana 1.22-25
[Importance of proper examination].
Chowkhamba Krishnadas Academy.
5. Chauhan, N. S., Singh, A., & Sharma, P.
(2021). Current status of diagnostic
technologies in Ayurvedic healthcare: A
national survey of 120 teaching hospitals.
Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative
Medicine, 12(2), 156-164.
6. Sharma, P., & Patel, A. (2022).
Metabolomic signatures of prakriti types: A
mass spectrometry analysis of biochemical
correlates to Ayurvedic constitutional
types. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 9876-9885.
7. Kumar, S., Ramachandran, U., & Mallick,
B. N. (2023). Neurological correlates of
dhyana practices: A functional MRI study
of meditation techniques described in
classical Ayurvedic texts. Neuroscience
Letters, 787, 136777.
8. Mehta, P., & Singh, R. (2021).
Thermographic validation of ama concept:
Infrared imaging patterns corresponding
with Ayurvedic diagnosis of metabolic
toxins. International Journal of Yoga,
14(2), 131-139.
9. Gopinath, H., Karthikeyan, M., &
Venugopal, V. (2020). Standardization
protocols for Ayurvedic formulations using
high-performance liquid chromatography:
A multi-center validation study. BMC
Complementary Medicine and Therapies,
20(1), 112-120.
Issue : 01 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTICS AND RESEARCH [ISSN No.: 2584-2757]Volume : 03
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 139
10. Vaidya, A. D. B., & Debnath, P. (2022).
Complementary diagnostics: A framework
for integrating traditional Ayurvedic
assessment with modern investigations.
Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative
Medicine, 13(2), 100433.
11. Sharma, S., Rathore, A. S., & Nagarathna,
R. (2024). Interpretive frameworks for
laboratory results in Ayurvedic practice: A
survey of 350 physicians. Ancient Science
of Life, 43(2), 102-111.
12. Bajpai, R., & Murthy, K. R. (2023). Ethical
considerations in integrating modern
investigations with Ayurvedic practice:
Patient perspectives and consent processes.
Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative
Medicine, 14(3), 245-253.
13. Heinonen, T., & Patel, J. (2022).
Personalized Ayurvedic medicine:
Integration of prakriti assessment with
genetic screening in Swiss integrative
clinics. European Journal of Integrative
Medicine, 51, 102135.
14. Indian Council of Medical Research.
(2023). Guidelines for incorporating
laboratory investigations in Ayurvedic
clinical trials. ICMR Press.
15. Acharya, J. T. (Ed.). (2010). Charaka
Samhita of Agnivesha, Vimana Sthana 4.12
[Knowledge of measurement science].
Chaukhambha Orientalia.
16. Acharya, J. T. (Ed.). (2010). Charaka
Samhita of Agnivesha, Vimana Sthana 8.84
[Methods of knowledge acquisition].
Chaukhambha Orientalia.
17. Acharya, Y. T. (Ed.). (2009). Sushruta
Samhita of Sushruta, Sutra Sthana 15.48
[Principles of scientific exposition].
Chaukhambha Orientalia.
18. Nair, B., & Gopinath, N. (2021).
Correlation between pitta dosha imbalances
and inflammatory biomarkers: Implications
for integrated diagnosis. Journal of Clinical
and Diagnostic Research, 15(7), OC01-
OC05.
19. Chakraborty, S., & Sen, S. (2023).
Development and validation of an
algorithm for interpretation of laboratory
parameters within tridosha framework.
Ancient Science of Life, 42(4), 187-196.
20. Menon, S., Varma, M., & Krishna, A.
(2022). Five-year outcomes of integrated
Ayurvedic-conventional management in
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 139
10. Vaidya, A. D. B., & Debnath, P. (2022).
Complementary diagnostics: A framework
for integrating traditional Ayurvedic
assessment with modern investigations.
Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative
Medicine, 13(2), 100433.
11. Sharma, S., Rathore, A. S., & Nagarathna,
R. (2024). Interpretive frameworks for
laboratory results in Ayurvedic practice: A
survey of 350 physicians. Ancient Science
of Life, 43(2), 102-111.
12. Bajpai, R., & Murthy, K. R. (2023). Ethical
considerations in integrating modern
investigations with Ayurvedic practice:
Patient perspectives and consent processes.
Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative
Medicine, 14(3), 245-253.
13. Heinonen, T., & Patel, J. (2022).
Personalized Ayurvedic medicine:
Integration of prakriti assessment with
genetic screening in Swiss integrative
clinics. European Journal of Integrative
Medicine, 51, 102135.
14. Indian Council of Medical Research.
(2023). Guidelines for incorporating
laboratory investigations in Ayurvedic
clinical trials. ICMR Press.
15. Acharya, J. T. (Ed.). (2010). Charaka
Samhita of Agnivesha, Vimana Sthana 4.12
[Knowledge of measurement science].
Chaukhambha Orientalia.
16. Acharya, J. T. (Ed.). (2010). Charaka
Samhita of Agnivesha, Vimana Sthana 8.84
[Methods of knowledge acquisition].
Chaukhambha Orientalia.
17. Acharya, Y. T. (Ed.). (2009). Sushruta
Samhita of Sushruta, Sutra Sthana 15.48
[Principles of scientific exposition].
Chaukhambha Orientalia.
18. Nair, B., & Gopinath, N. (2021).
Correlation between pitta dosha imbalances
and inflammatory biomarkers: Implications
for integrated diagnosis. Journal of Clinical
and Diagnostic Research, 15(7), OC01-
OC05.
19. Chakraborty, S., & Sen, S. (2023).
Development and validation of an
algorithm for interpretation of laboratory
parameters within tridosha framework.
Ancient Science of Life, 42(4), 187-196.
20. Menon, S., Varma, M., & Krishna, A.
(2022). Five-year outcomes of integrated
Ayurvedic-conventional management in
Issue : 01 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTICS AND RESEARCH [ISSN No.: 2584-2757]Volume : 03
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 140
chronic kidney disease: A prospective
cohort study. BMC Nephrology, 23(1), 47-
56.
21. Patel, M., Joshi, N., & Ravishankar, B.
(2023). Effects of traditional rasayana
therapy on telomere length and oxidative
stress markers: A randomized controlled
trial. Journal of Alternative and
Complementary Medicine, 29(3), 245-254.
22. Vaidya, R., & Nagarathna, R. (2024).
Integrative knowing: Epistemological
frameworks for bridging traditional
wisdom and scientific evidence in
healthcare. Philosophy, Ethics, and
Humanities in Medicine, 19(1), 3-12
23. Joshi, K., & Patwardhan, B. (2021).
Correlation between genomic markers and
Ayurvedic prakriti assessment:
Implications for personalized medicine.
Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 279,
114362.
Declaration :
Conflict of Interest : None
ISSN: 2584-2757
DOI : 1 0 . 5 2 8 1 / z e n o d o . 1 7 3 5 9 8 2 9
Dr. Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research
This work is licensed under Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 License
Submission Link : http://www.ijdrindia.com
Benefits of Publishing with us
Fast peer review process
Global archiving of the articles
Unrestricted open online access
Author retains copyright
Unique DOI for all articles
Copyright @ : - Dr.Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID00083 |ISSN :2584-2757 140
chronic kidney disease: A prospective
cohort study. BMC Nephrology, 23(1), 47-
56.
21. Patel, M., Joshi, N., & Ravishankar, B.
(2023). Effects of traditional rasayana
therapy on telomere length and oxidative
stress markers: A randomized controlled
trial. Journal of Alternative and
Complementary Medicine, 29(3), 245-254.
22. Vaidya, R., & Nagarathna, R. (2024).
Integrative knowing: Epistemological
frameworks for bridging traditional
wisdom and scientific evidence in
healthcare. Philosophy, Ethics, and
Humanities in Medicine, 19(1), 3-12
23. Joshi, K., & Patwardhan, B. (2021).
Correlation between genomic markers and
Ayurvedic prakriti assessment:
Implications for personalized medicine.
Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 279,
114362.
Declaration :
Conflict of Interest : None
ISSN: 2584-2757
DOI : 1 0 . 5 2 8 1 / z e n o d o . 1 7 3 5 9 8 2 9
Dr. Midhila K.J. Inter. J.Digno. and Research
This work is licensed under Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 License
Submission Link : http://www.ijdrindia.com
Benefits of Publishing with us
Fast peer review process
Global archiving of the articles
Unrestricted open online access
Author retains copyright
Unique DOI for all articles